โEach detail, each name, every sigh, and the color of the clouds, as well as the executionerโs gesture.โ
โSimon Dubnow, from Charles Baxterโs Wonderlands: Essays on the Life of Literature.
I have always distrusted over-talkers.
Maybe you know the type, or are blushing because you are one yourself. They talk over other people, but they also blabber on and almost never focus their arguments. Or seem to listen to who theyโre talking to. They are exclusive and donโt really care what you think about anything. They are infuriating people.
I distrust them because I know them very, very well: I was one of them. I am no more.
What saved me?
Daytalking is not about talking per se. I like the โDayโ part because it involves bright sunlight and clean, clear airโitโs about relationships and how you manage them. Itโs a form of โclearing the air,โ but most of all listening and being patient. Heavy on the โbeingโ part.
Because I was once an over-talker, Iโve since learned how much it pains people. You know that moment when youโre babbling away and you glance at the person youโve been talking to (not with, but to) and their glazed eyes are everywhere else but on you? Thatโs painโthe other personโs, not yours.
I bring this up because post-COVID-19 pandemic, Iโve seen people absolutely drowning themselves and others in idle talk. Hey, I get it. Itโs been a maddeningly lonely stretch of road. Unimaginable. Unprecedented. LONELY. Isolating. Loooonnnnnnnng stretch of road.
But that goddamn pandemic however offered an opportunity: Restoring relationships in a fundamental way. I would suggest first acknowledging the other person and then, holding off as long as possible about whatever is on your mind. There are layers of communication and Iโve noticed that, since Iโve been off most social media (Facebook in 2009โshitcanned. Twitter in 2016โvamoose, Bruce! And Instagram in 2018โbless their lilโ hearts they photograph things! Buh-bye), the remaining things Iโm a part of (LinkedIn, and feel free to connect with me there) still tax my patience when people fail to acknowledge and include others. Or overshare and bloviate. Hey, just keep an eye out for it. Itโs fixable.
Not sure the best way to excise โIโ and โmeโ from most peopleโs writing, but it can be done. Would suggest doing what this sentence attempts to doโjust cut them out altogether. It can be done. Be cognizant of the weight of โI,โ โme,โ โmy,โ and work toward โwe,โ โour,โ or even spending a post being curious about another human being.
Thatโs the plan, Stan.
Our little cohort here on Substack has diminished by two or three subscribers, and Iโm trying not to feel sad about that. I wish everyone well and glad for the joiners and stayers.
So letโs have some fun, shall we?
Welcome to โIn the Sandbox,โ our StoryShed community huddle around each aspect of Daytalking, Nightwalking, and Stargazing, where we get to have some fun. By actively writing and reflecting on your personal history, youโre better able to grapple with your present and more confidently approach your future. Interacting with the rest of our Substack community brings in possibly new and untried ideas and encourages further reflection, support, and action. At least thatโs the goal.
Daytalking is best approached with a sense of playfulness, so hereโs this weekโs prompt:
Letโs noodle some nonsense names (three at the least, five tops) consisting of first name and surname. As you write them down, be thinking about what they could be as characters in a story (or real life)โbut donโt include that in your response. Thatโs where the rest of us will come in and react to your chosen names in the comments.
Iโll chime in after everyone else has had a chance to comment. Have fun!
Dominic Youngberry
Genevieve Tribe
Ethan Van Bagget
Norah Feind
Gavin Gansen
OK, here's some fictional names, let's go:
Jerrick Brothel
Sally Salient
Maria Agustina Van Tassel
Slim Toyoda
Shimmer Stairs